Module talk:WikidataIB
 | Module:WikidataIB is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.
|
 | This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Page history | ||
| |||
|
|
||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Multiple qualifiers
editIs there a way to filter a property with many values by two or more qualifiers? Serresmap (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Serresmap: I don't think so. I recommend using Module:Wd instead, e.g.
{{#invoke:wd|properties|Q55|P7295|P518=Q762943|P1365=Q11184}}. LennardHofmann (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Option to get 'raw value'
editThere should be an option to get raw value of a wikidata item using this module, similar to what we get from {{wikidata|property|raw|...}}.
Absence of this option makes the template difficult to be used in infoboxes which require some wikidata property of a wikidata item which in turn is specified by some property of the given |qid=.
This is necessary in order to comply with this RFC and this list of RFCs which make it mandatory to use {{Wdib}} with |osd=true in infoboxes.
An example requirement is |mla= of {{Infobox Indian Constituency (wd)}}. Riteze 08:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
open and close quotation mark
editMany of Quotation marks have opening and closing, so both open and close quotation mark should be able to specified in /titleformats. FlatLanguage (talk) 18:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Please see MOS:CURLY. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- /titleformats is for i18n, so projects other than enwiki should be considered. --FlatLanguage (talk) 01:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)