Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhakar Tomar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Sudhakar Tomar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sudhakar Tomar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable businessperson, fails WP:NBIO. "Top 100" lists are really not useful to establish notability unless there's some more meat in the hamburger. And established notability practice is that non-notable awards from non-notable organizations also don't contribute. So we've got basically nothing left here for sourcing. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Unconscionable (pardon me) Blatant spam written as if Wikipedia is LinkedIn. – Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Only this [1] article might be notable but also i am quite confused about these site which is named as Turkish British Council but this is not enough to prove. AD ^Talk 04:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - can't find anything to suggest notability; promotional Spiderone 23:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:NBIO. These awards fall short of the 'well-known and significant award or honor' criteria of WP:ANYBIO, and I was unable to find coverage that meets the in depth, independent, reliable coverage required by WP:GNG. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - independent reliable coverage not found and failure of WP:NBIO. Reddragon7 (talk) 11:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.